|
|
|
|
|
by geokon
10 days ago
|
|
Hopefully people see this comment b/c mine was a bad/incorrect summary :) I real liked the orgmode workflow b/c the code was self documenting in a sense.
I had a very similar workflow for many years (though I've since stopped)
But I do remember that in the leiningen days when I was first learning Clojure,
the idea of tangling and attaching my own fork was just too intimidating and confusing.
With the deps.edn workflow it'd have been less of a hassle now Thank you for all your work. I still used geom basically every week (generating graphics for my PhD) Your blog post is great. I think your point about the silo'ing and lack of cross pollination of idea between langs/frameworks is interesting, but also a product of just time-investment. I used to code C++ and the C++ gurus were always very miopic b/c they simply had no time for anything else. To the last idea,
I feel the ease of creating and having performance available is always in tension. I have a friend who works in Touchdesigner and I'm always left a bit embarrassed that no written programming language seems to hit the same level of productivity. Going down the stack can be fruitful, but I think there are still more levels of abstraction that need to be explored. At a high level.. even if you're writing immutable functional code.. it just all still feels too coupled to me. These days, I'm personally think the next step is something like Pathom. Where your declare decoupled relationships between inputs and outputs and have a engine derive your computation. |
|