[nsingh2]

It's such an obviously bad policy, it's mind-boggling that they thought this was a good idea. It just breeds paranoia and mistrust, especially when people are already a bit paranoid about silent model quantification for cost cutting reasons.

[SXX]

Its not pranoia when entity you are dealing with cant be trusted and will do everything to abuse your trust.

[llelouch]

What's the alternative? Not release the model at all?

"Make the guardrails better" isn't very hard and probably not worth the effort.

[hagbarth]

The alternative is to be explicit when you nerf, so users know what they are working with.

[port11]

I guess people would just game the system and find ways around these guardrails.

[rootlocus]

They have enough info on you and your sessions to eventually catch you, label you as bad faith actor and ban you automatically. I don't think many would risk it.

[schnitzelstoat]

That seems to be working well for Mythos. Just never release it and keep talking about how 'dangerous' it is to pump up the IPO price.

[SamvitJ]

Do you mean "quantization" not quantification?

[nsingh2]

Yup, I meant to write quantization there.

[KennyBlanken]

Another "knob" is reducing the thinking time...