[black_knight]

Not these. I wonder if the well is poisoned there. The models know that these are "unpossible", so it might not solve them just because… Maybe some day.

I am just testing it on stuff I know intimately myself. I would probably not understand a proof of Collatz if it was dansing in front of me!

[komali2]

So, what kind of problems are you having it try to solve?

Sorry to belabor this but it's basically pointless saying you have nuts it can't crack without showing us the nuts.

[black_knight]

I don’t care to share my exact problems. Mostly because gpt -5.5 hallucinates false solutions, and I would rather not have people reply with "Oh but ChatGPT solves it!", because it takes expert knowledge to debunk them. To their credit ChatGPT will admit their, very fundamental mistakes when pointed out to them. But also because no-one would really care.

I gave a high level description of the problems in a sibling thread. They are the kind of small problems which I suppose every researcher has lying around, waiting for them to think about some day. But not the big problem everyone is waiting for to be solved.

My comment was not meant to be a tease – sorry! I assumed there would be other people in a similar situation, who might relate.

[neonstatic]

Bro, you are being left behind bro, it's amazing bro...

[Lerc]

That's a bit of a tricky point. I have had quite a lot of problems with models informing me what I am attempting is impossible. If no-one has done it, or at least it doesn't know about it being done it tends to fall back on people voicing their baseless speculations, and for just about anything you propose, you can find a person who will loudly proclaim it is impossible.

The curse of the 'use case' comes in here too. When people think that everything should have a use case, that's a lot of training data suggesting to a model that things should only be used for what someone has already thought of.

A couple of times I have had to manually code proof of concept pieces so that the model breaks out of that "unpossible" mode and actually helps me.

I can't remember if it was chatGPT or Claude, but when I showed it how to get a MessagePort in its JavaScript executor through to the artifact/canvas, it quickly went from "That can't be done" to positively enthusiastic about the possibilities. I suspect those shenanigans will be well off the table for Fable though.

[unnouinceput]

Stop dancing and share the prompt, we're dying to see it

[black_knight]

Hey, stop asking to see my nuts! My nuts are private – okay?

(Joking aside, see sibling threads.)