[jstummbillig]

Less fascinating when you consider that this is a non-coders perspective.

[CobrastanJorji]

It's still fascinating, but for a different reason. The "Concord" tool that got created bills itself as "Instrument-grade measurement of qualitative text. Explore in minutes, publish with honest statistics." Instrument-grade! How wonderful! That presumably means its accuracy has been ensured, and it's been carefully calibrated, right? What, nobody's ever measured or even examined the code? Well, no matter, let's go ahead and publish it and advertise it as "honest" "instrument-grade measurements."

[reedlaw]

Yeah, the README looks like slop to me.

[eithed]

Fair enough, but enterpreunership should, I guess, ask questions if given Next Big Thing has substance behind it or is it just snake oil.

[munk-a]

Ah, but billions of dollars depend on those questions not being asked in a genuine manner. Don't you want a slice of that or are you an... AI skeptic thunder clashes.

[unholiness]

Yeah, this made it basically clickbait for me, in terms of time I wasted with the wrong expectation.

The lack of downvotes on posts on HN has always felt like more of a bug than a feature to me.

[nomel]

So, the perspective of the one that gains the most, that will value this the most, and that will pay the most? ;)