|
|
|
|
|
by brookst
11 days ago
|
|
I’m having a hard time parsing that. Are you suggesting that PCC specifically is sending things in plaintext, or that the security promises in the server and arch are false, or that a compromised CA means… IDK what? I’m with you on the big principles, but are you implying more specific attack vectors or just kind of maybe everything could be compromised somehow? |
|
http://web.archive.org/web/20140101231153/https://www.washin...
https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/06/on-nsa/