[kilroy123]

I am still convinced that Apple is slowly working its way to smart glasses. And that *this* is the Next Big Thing. Frankly, the future is very good AR glasses that just work.

- iPhone Air to cram everything into a small space

- Vision pro - a new OS for looking at things and interacting

- Better Siri and AI that works with voice

- Smart local model / routing to big models in the cloud

- integration with wearables (air pods and watches)

[mschuster91]

Smart glasses aren't well-liked by the mainstream population. The term "glasshole" exists for a reason.

[infecto]

Never have even heard of the word before.

[swiftcoder]

The term is nearly old enough to have a driving license - google glass came out 14 years ago

[infecto]

Ahh maybe that’s it. Old slang that’s not used often enough these days.

[swiftcoder]

Good luck reading an article about Meta Raybans without running into the term. That said, the whole smartglasses thing seems to be pretty dead as a concept - at least in part because public opinion is not on the side of folks wandering around with stealthy cameras on their faces

[infecto]

I have actually looked into meta glasses a number of times. Never saw the term. Learn something new everyday thanks for sharing this old term with the group!

[sigzero]

Then you haven't been paying attention.

[infecto]

Maybe you are in bubble? Looks like it’s really old slang and I have not heard that word in the last decade in Silicon Valley or elsewhere.

[iamnothere]

It was never common slang. A few journalists tried to force it to be “a thing” but it never caught on, because forced memes never work.

(I do hate camera glasses though.)

[layer8]

It has had a revival with the Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses. I don't know about Silicon Valley, but you frequently see it in tech-oriented forums when the topic comes up.

[sleepybrett]

Smart glasses WITH cameras and microphones aren't well liked by the mainstream population.

What if the glasses are display only and paired to an iphone for most of it's 'senses'?

[hapticmonkey]

They’ve been working towards this since the introduction of ARKit in iOS back in 2016. Maybe even earlier.

They’ve done a very good job at proving the required tech with stuff like putting LiDAR in iPhones which is key to the Vision Pro….which is their AR interaction model testing ground. They are taking a pretty measured approach.

I just don’t think the physical tech is ready for AR glasses that reach a level of polish that Apple would ship mass market. But all the other pieces are there.

[SirMaster]

I have 0 interest in wearing glasses on my head all the time though.

People spend several thousand on Lasik so they don't have to wear glasses all the time.

I don't see glasses as the ultimate form factor that everyone uses.

[kbelder]

I'm not sure Apple will provide it or not, but I don't see a future that doesn't have nearly ubiquitous smart glasses. The potential usefulness is too great.

Obviously it'll be a big cultural conflict for a while. But again... the usefulness is too great for it not to happen. Cultural objections will give way, I think. Maybe it'll have to wait for a generation to die off.

[Peanuts99]

This would not be a net benefit to society.

[irieie]

It’s amazing how people post with such confidence - exhibiting the behaviour that they just posted something of immense value.

lol no you did not. A whole lot of nothing.