[VladVladikoff]

Speaking of slow, what I absolutely cannot comprehend is why ghostty is so popular. Despite being written in Zig it is very slow and a total CPU and memory hog. Just sitting there idle it’s pulling a constant 40% of my CPU? No thanks!

[mitchellh]

I'm the creator of Ghostty. This isn't right. It should idle at 0 to 1%, as supported by sibling comments. If you can collect more details about your system please open a discussion on the main Ghostty repo. Same with memory.

In terms of speed, same thing: if you can provide some kind of objectively measurable thing, we can look into it. Everything we've measured so far firmly places Ghostty in the "fast" camp (with friends such as Kitty).

We're sometimes faster, sometimes slower, but in any case not noticeably so. You wouldn't pick Ghostty vs Kitty for example for performance, it'd be something else. But you would pick Ghostty over say... iTerm2 for performance (but you may pick iTerm2 for features, its extremely feature rich!).

[esseph]

> Just sitting there idle it’s pulling a constant 40% of my CPU? No thanks!

You need to figure out what is going on because that certainly isn't normal.

Literally seeing 0.0% on Linux

[Analemma_]

I suspect you enabled some weird setting that you've forgotten about. ghostty isn't unimaginably fast but it's faster than iTerm 2 which is plenty. And I'm sitting here with a lengthy Claude Code session open, as well as a couple tabs for my docker container and dev servers, and its idle CPU usage is 0.0%.

[quotemstr]

WezTerm is great too and, AFAICT, is everything Ghostty wants to be. Kitty is also very good, although WezTerm edges it out for having an integrated muxer.

I can't understand Ghostty either except as some kind of trendy memetic thing, the $GME of the TTY world.

[rewgs]

Yup. For a while I was switching between all three to see which I liked most, and I always end up coming back to Wezterm. The only issue I’ve encountered is that releases on various package managers are routinely broken, but building from source solved that.

[liveoneggs]

My ghostty is using 0.4$ - 2.5%?

[saberience]

I know ghostty is designed to be super high performance but I find it both uglier and slower than Iterm2!

I started using it expecting to love it, but in reality it didn't seem to gain me anything but in fact was worse in several major ways. Also less configurable than Iterm2. :/

[stavros]

That happened to me too, turns out my desktop was software accelerated because I had screwed up the GPU config somehow. I asked Claude to fix it and it did.

[dismalaf]

This. Ghostty is significantly slower than Kitty on my Arch setup. It's still fast enough I guess, but no reason to switch from Kitty for me.

[esseph]

Software accel?

[dismalaf]

Not that slow. It's certainly a bit faster than, say, VTE, and maybe even quicker than Wezterm, Kitty just feels faster when rendering editors or TUIs with a lot happening...