|
|
|
|
|
|
by oblio
3 days ago
|
|
|
> Brooks is weirdly sexist, but it's unsurprising that (higher) "intelligence" should mean things that are hard, not things that are easy. Way to miss the mark (and also shift the discussion to woke conversation points on a comment from 4+ decades ago). The point of his entire comment is that it seems like the "hard things" (aka abstract science) will be a lot harder for AI than "easy things" (a 5 year old or a dog understanding their environment in great detail, from depth perception to smells, sounds, etc, etc). Your comment looks like it was written by exactly the kind of man Brooks was mocking. |
|
|