[ljosifov]

Thanks for the tear down. IDK anything about quantum (my knowledge there starts and ends with https://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/lec9.html), but amused enough to follow in the background. See whether it ends crazy-bad or crazy-good. :-)

And just today now I saw this https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07352. What's your take on it?

Am old enough to have witnessed more than one wave of "impossible things" happen for real in my lifetime, so lets see. As long as the scientific method (evidence, publication, replication, testing, etc) is mostly followed am curious enough to check blog posts or interviews from time to time.

[dabadabad00]

Your first link is very insightful, and you should know not the way I have come to learn.

I have peeked beneath the skirt if you will and I can hazard to tell you something of quantum truths that no one will accept or agree with in our time.

Spin disposition is not the most information dense property of the quantum domain, nor is it even ideal. Qubits are a dead end. It is like saying the information density of a coin is heads or tails, while ignoring that absolutely any image may be etched into either side.

The quantum domain conceals quantum holography, which over a long enough timeline will reveal that analog multidimensional holographic memory can store anything, and I do mean anything.

Entanglement allows this domain to be increased to any scale, just like actual holography, in which the larger the hologram (more entangled wave fronts) the greater and sharper the resolution, and breaking this down will result in proportionally degraded resolution of the whole.

I contend that life does this in our very own minds, and that is the true nature of consciousness, the manipulation of holographic memory through mass entanglement.

Modern thinkers will balk that science has not proven any part of that and therefore cannot be considered true.

This “constructor theory” is like the cognitive constraints described in the first link. Engineers must constrain themselves to provable rules.

If you look at living systems, anything can be kludged together, and refined or optimized over time. From shape shifting cuttlefish, electric eels, various forms of flight, limb regeneration, bioluminescence, and so much more. All things that “holograms” can easily render and project through biofeedback upon physical reality, yet none of which can be understood or explained by such highly constrained rules based systems devisable by modern scientific thinkers.