|
|
|
|
|
|
by pdimitar
4 days ago
|
|
|
Beautifully put and I agree, with one nuance: There are multiple ways to think about how to write software, and that number really is not as high as various language proponents want us to believe. They aim at 50-100 but I'd say we got maximum 20, if not 6-7. Point being: stuff is starting to converge IMO. It's not endless exciting diversity. "How to write software" (and adjacently: what PL to use) is just a boring multi-dimensional math problem at its root. |
|
|