|
|
|
|
|
|
by crooked-v
4 days ago
|
|
|
> Trying to say it was 5 miles away 23 seconds after an unknown reference is being intentionally obtuse. The article specifically says: > just 23 seconds after San Police Officers in Golden Hill tried stopping the suspected carjacker > Their tort claim notes that the path the men took to the cigar lounge passed by several other Flock cameras, which could have corroborated their story, as well as the location data on their cell phones. Your argument is that, what, this guy you argue has no money also hacked the phone company to fake their records while driving at 100 mph through San Diego under an invisibility cloak so no other cameras or people saw anything? |
|
|