>doesn’t seem to be replicating documents all too well based on the many other testimonies in these comments
Ironic, that you are agreeing with a post saying they put in little effort for the implementation when you have put in absolutely no effort in saying that it doesn't produce pixel-faithful documents, such as producing a single concrete example.
Well, yes, because it doesn't work.
> Bit identical/pixel-faithful reproductions are easy to verify…
And yet the prompter put so little effort in they couldn't even verify the software they prompted for does what it's supposed to.