[Retr0id]

The whole premise of what's being described here is to bake the weights into the silicon. That isn't what I'd describe as vendor lock-in, any more than I'd describe a CPU that can only execute ARM instructions as vendor locked.

To answer my own question, I bet they could figure out a way to still bill you per-token, if they wanted to.

[brookst]

Portability between x86 and ARM is not a form of vendor lock?

And of course they could bill per-token, same way cable PPV worked (the bits were already in your house). But the cost structure of weights in silicon means that competitors would be encouraged to compete on this per-token cost, as their marginal cost would be zero.

I don’t see that being a durable business model, but I guess the counter argument is it’s also similar to game consoles, where initial hardware is subsidized and the business model assumes ongoing payment for bits.