[l23k4]

>Following the rules of passive indexes is the whole point.

The whole point of these indices is to represent the market, the rules are unsustainable if they cause too big of a divergence from that goal.

> The blatantly corrupt move to change the rules

Why do you think nobody in the financial press is reporting on this blatant corruption? Is it because this conspiracy also includes all of the news media?

[matwood]

There’s too much anti AI/Elon emotion to have discussions around this issue at this point. HN is usually pretty good about rational discussions, but AI has really triggered people on both sides.

For example, yesterday I posted a link to the Nasdaq faq about the change, and my comment was flagged hah!

[l23k4]

Yep, almost all of my comments questioning this conspiracy theory have been flagged, with many being set [dead] by them moderators.

[worik]

> Why do you think nobody in the financial press is reporting on this blatant corruption?

They are

[l23k4]

Why is nobody able to link this reporting? Google doesn't find it either.