The phrasing seems to infer that they were vocally or otherwise disruptive in a way that meaningfully+negatively impacted the conference.
The reality is they had
handed out copies of an editorial
that criticizes the administration's cuts to biomedical research
...when they were approached by security guards and police officers
not just biomedical research, but specifically diabetes research. it is reasonable for forbid diabetes researchers from discussing their funding issues during a conference specifically for them?
The phrasing seems to infer that they were vocally or otherwise disruptive in a way that meaningfully+negatively impacted the conference.
The reality is they had
this editorial: https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/49/6/901/164764/Mi...