[homarp]

Why do you think that the anon-free internet will ensure there are no bots?

current bots are run and financed by humans already.

And what makes you think that current newspapers will evolve and regain trust? (as most of them are financed by 'rich' owners and therefore somehow influenced by the 'desire' of the owner).

<insert not-a-bot proof by anubis + 'pseudonymous reputation' >

[pixl97]

Yep, in an anon free internet if you can get a bot running it's worth even more than on the anon internet because you know exactly who the data belongs to that your capturing, and you can attempt to directly influence known people.

This and the myriad of poor people that exist will have financial incentives to sell their identity to groups that will run bots behind them.