|
|
|
|
|
by nazgul17
12 days ago
|
|
In a scenario like this, where we can only know if the code has bugs, not if it doesn't, isn't survival analysis a more appropriate statistical technique? I.e. a technique where time is a first-class citizen. By the way, I did find this a bit hard to read but, as instructed by OP, I'll go fuck myself. For what it's worth, I find AI written prose easy to read, and am annoyed by all the constant HN comments which just point out the author was AI, without anything else substantive to add. |
|