|
|
|
|
|
|
by msla
19 days ago
|
|
|
> IMO, if c++/cfront didn't ride on the tails of c, I'm skeptical it would've seen widespread use Obviously. C++ was a "better C" in that you could keep a lot of your "legacy" C code while improving your codebase piecemeal with C++ features. Your management didn't even have to care, in that C/C++ was accepted as a valid descriptor even by people who should have known better. It's a wonder Java/C# and Perl/PHP never caught on. |
|
|