[heldrida]

I stick with Conventional Commits as a standardised way for communicating changes. Most contributions in the form of open PRs are squashed before merging into base branches. A team member can commit as personally wished in the feature branch. I still use CC for my own sanity and I’m very glad I do comparatively to what usually find in others feature branch commit histories.

Without standards most developers I’ve seen are very careless.

I generally work with changesets to curate changes at the time of contribution in accordance to semantic versioning.

What’s great about CC is the simplicity.