[andrewjf]

I agree with you, but haven't really left yet since there's still a good amount of discourse outside AI related topics. Seems a significant amount of contributors here are all to eager to fall over themselves putting themselves, their juniors, children, and colleagues out of work, long term.

[freetime2]

My personal stance is that the genie is out of the bottle, and there's likely no putting it back. Kind of like nuclear weapons: I wish they didn't exist, but since they do I'd rather be on the side that has them.

Honestly it's an incredible technology the likes of which I never thought I would see in my lifetime. It's definitely not perfect, but it is improving at a frightening pace. Some days I am optimistic for how it might shape the future, and other days I am scared.

If goverments wanted to make a credible effort to limit how they are used, I would support that. But I'm not terribly optimistic that can or will happen.

[stodor89]

> Kind of like nuclear weapons

True, but you're not being bombarded 24/7 with irrelevant -- and most likely false -- information about nuclear weapons.

[PaulDavisThe1st]

How a post about "Hacker News, Sans AI" became about .... AI !

[classified]

Distinction is perfect continence.

[archagon]

TBH, I'm mostly here out of spite at this point. It's unhealthy but I can't seem to stop rage-reading.

[dijksterhuis]

urgh, i'm with you on this. i need to stop, but i can't for some reason.