Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by block_dagger 6 days ago
At my employer, if AI is not used, it shows up on your performance report and you’ll be told if you don’t start using it, you will be dismissed. I work at a medium sized successful YC-backed SaaS. So here, the attribution is meaningless - they look at your Bedrock and LLM API calls as well as Claude Code history.
4 comments
Aurornis 6 days ago
If the company policy is to have everyone using it then everyone is going to assume you're using it.

I don't see a need for an attribution line in this case.

link
fragmede 6 days ago
Do you fellow ICs have access to those reports and can correlate commits from you to the prompts used to create them easily?
link
block_dagger 6 days ago
Not currently. Each IC's report is kept private unless they voluntarily share it, and IC's don't have visibility into other IC's Claude Code or Cursor logs. I think we're moving toward a model where it will be easier to correlate commits with chats, but timeline is not clear.
link
fragmede 5 days ago
Seems far more efficient to just have a line the commit message then.
link
vips7L 6 days ago
https://github.com/dtnewman/burn-baby-burn
link
ethagnawl 6 days ago
> they look at your Bedrock and LLM API calls as well as Claude Code history.

This is fucking insane. How does this correlate with productivity in any way? The results are all that matters, who cares how you got there?

link
andrekandre 5 days ago 

  > The results are all that matters, who cares how you got there?
i actually said this at $JOB to a manager, to which they replied "yes, but in the future all code will be ai generated, so thats the 'results' we are looking for"....
link