[trwired]

Is that a bad thing? I mean from the perspective of Anthropic's marketing department sure, but if agents are just another type of tool in developer's tool belt - as I see people recently like to claim - attribution feels kinda weird. In the end it is the developer who is responsible for their commits.

[eli]

Yeah I think it's a bad thing. It's context about how open source code was written that is lost.

And I guess maybe there's no such thing as bad press but at least in this cases it doesn't seem like effective marketing for Anthropic.