[dang]

Comments like this do more of what they complain about, only with an extra layer of judgment.

It would be preferable if someone would seed a better discussion by engaging with the article's claims/observations.

[ex-aws-dude]

Why did you the admin allow such ragebait to stay on the front page then?

Is that the kind of low effort posts we want around here? Just a link to a github comment of a screenshot?

You're complicit here in fueling the harassment of an open source project

[dang]

I don't have enough background info to understand what you're referring to here.

Even if you're right, though, you shouldn't be posting comments that break the site guidelines.

[ex-aws-dude]

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342705

People opening issues just to rant against an open source project is acceptable content for HN?

How is that even allowed in the first place without getting flagged/removed?

And every time that happens the project gets brigaded from HN users

[dang]

People have been ranting for, against, and about open source projects since open source began.

Please follow the site guidelines from now on.

[ex-aws-dude]

This ain’t a rant it’s literally a screenshot of a mastodon tweet posted on an issue page

How does low effort rage-bait spark curiosity?

The comment to upvote ratio clearly shows it’s inflammatory