| > if c++/cfront didn't ride on the tails of c, I'm skeptical it would've seen widespread use What launched C++ into success was Zortech C++. At the time, 90% of programming was done on MS-DOS. Cfront was nearly unusable on DOS, because: 1. agonizingly slow to compile 2. no support for near/far pointers, which was essential for non-trivial apps Zortech C++ fixed those problems, and sold like wildfire. This provided critical mass for C++ to succeed. The traffic on comp.lang.c++ angled sharply upward. Borland saw our sales, and abandoned their OOP language product and did Turbo C++ instead. Microsoft saw Borland's success and then did their own C++. We sold a lot of Zortech C++ compilers to Microsoft. They used it to develop COM. I heard rumors that Microsoft was developing their own OOP C, called C*. I've never been able to confirm it, though. |