[mynameisvlad]

It has "Live Updates" in big bold text as one of the first and most prominent lines on the page so... yes? Is that a problem?

Publications have had live-updating articles for things ongoing for years. This seems both entirely reasonable and normal, and I'm not sure what the concern or issue is.

[glitcher]

I read their comment as a simple “oh ok I understand now” type of clarification, not a complaint.

[red_Seashell_32]

As per submission guidelines:

> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.

So, even if you use original title, once "Live Update" article changes, it might seem that submission did not use original title.

[mynameisvlad]

The point of the rule is to not editorialize, not to keep an always-updating title.

[munk-a]

Given that the title was highly accurate at time of submission perhaps a moderator will update the title further but the submission seems to be inline with all the guidelines. This is actually also a case where I think it wouldn't be unappreciated to deviate a bit from the article title to something like Live Updates: Astronauts on ISS told...

[mynameisvlad]

100% and it has regularly happened in the past as live updates change the current state. Things like service status/degradation is a big one that comes to mind which is almost the same.