[bryanlarsen]

Hedonism is bad because:

- hedonic pleasures are adaptive. The first time you experience them is incredible. The 1000th time, much less so. - chasing hedonic pleasures is counter-productive. Studies show that people who actively seek out hedonic pleasure are less happy than those that don't.

OTOH, eudaimonic pleasure (aka fulfilment, satisfaction) is much more durable.

Work, hobbies, charity work, and children are avenues towards fulfilment. Far too many rely on work to provide it for them, but that's counter-productive for most.

[Daishiman]

> OTOH, eudaimonic pleasure (aka fulfilment, satisfaction) is much more durable.

I am not actually sure that this is consistent across most people who have had children.

[bryanlarsen]

Certainly not. It's much more likely to be successful than getting it from work, though.

[Noumenon72]

Happiness is the emotional reward for eudaimonia. Since I mostly reject eudaimonia as people and genes offering you carrots for doing what they want, not what you want, I naturally don't feel happiness like someone who's like "I'm winning, life is meaningful, others think well of me". I seek out hedonic pleasure because I think it's more real than happiness.

[lukeschlather]

I wonder how those who have experienced the pleasure of having 1000 children experience that compared to the first one.

[Supernaut]

It's a shame we can't ask Genghis Khan for his thoughts on the matter.