|
|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
15 days ago
|
|
|
> So why change? You're not building a case for why this change is needed It has changed loads of times. Nobody noticed any time. Including this one. (Look at flows into and out of related funds.) > Is there even another Nasdaq 100 company like SpaceX? Right now? No. Including SpaceX. By the end of the year? Probably a few. > Is it a fund or just an index? If an index, what are you monitoring when you cite 'no outflows'? Covered assets. Indices license their indices. Funds pay that royalty. |
|
|