Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by __turbobrew__ 7 days ago
I may be wrong, but last time I checked there was not a statically typed OTP implementation which is kindof a bummer. I think Gleam is the ideal implementation on top of the BEAM but it does just seem pretty immature.
1 comments

It’s had it for a long time now: https://gleam-otp.hexdocs.pm/index.html
> Not all Erlang/OTP functionality is included in this library. Some is not possible to represent in a type safe way, so it is not included. Other features are still in development, such as further process supervision strategies.

It seems like they are re-implementing a half baked OTP lookalike, but they aren’t actually using Erlang/OTP under the hood which gives me pause as the Erlang/OTP implementation has been battle tested over many decades now whereas the gleem implementation is a complete rewrite.

Sounds like you can’t be happy with Gleam or related libs. I’d look into it or use it before calling it “half-baked”.