|
|
|
|
|
by SideburnsOfDoom
17 days ago
|
|
> When the consciousness itself not understood and well defined in the first place, it is pretty pointless to debate if something is or isn't conscious. I don't think that this actually follows. Compare: "When Angels are not well defined in the first place, it is pretty pointless to debate if a pebble is or isn't an Angel" i.e. even if X is poorly defined, you can still often say that Y isn't plausibly X. |
|