[jodrellblank]

No, none. The point is not to claim that magic exists, but to to show the illogic in the claim “if magic exists then that makes it science”.

“Nothing happens unless it has an explanation within the laws of physics” is an assumption; if it was broken then it would be broken. The mountain would be inexplicably gone, not explicably gone.

[yencabulator]

I think what the comment tries to express is the well-trodden "if we can control magic then that makes it science", while the original conversation really was "what if God controls magic".

In that hypothetical, there could be testable proof of "a magic event occurred" without magic becoming part of science.

[defrost]

Sure, and I appreciate the science behind your blank nom de guerre.

That said, in the cut and thrust of conversation and or debate the example by dialogue isn't perhaps as clear cut a device as it may have seemed from your keyboard.

That might just be my reading <shrug>

[lazyasciiart]

It seems very clear to me, yes.