[NichoPaolucci]

We run a "context" repository that enables us to transition pretty seamlessly from model to model (usually codex to claude and back). It has skills / plugins / connectors / tooling in relatively malleable MD files. That's what I see as the future. Rather than exporting IDE settings we'll just carry our markdown to the next best tool.

It's hedging a bet at this point, but that's why people say there's no moat. If the tools are properly used + maintained, there should be no reason we can't use a new provider even next week (maybe with a little tweaking).

[ksajadi]

that's an interesting approach and something i also considered (using git to avoid conflicts). one thing i needed was a "database" (basically a folder of markdowns) with a fixed schema so i can let the agents record their decisions in (for example when the code conflicts with product design spec). this combined with search has been a real lifesaver.

this is how it works: https://help.markbase.cloud/humans/collections/overview

[NichoPaolucci]

Believe it or not, after writing this comment I was doing some more reading on the task. I'm planning to reorganize our context repo after finding this paper (it argues that AI generated context files can stunt the performance of models):

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11988

For what it's worth, if you were considering building context out.

[ksajadi]

Very interesting. Anecdotally I’ve found the opposite to be the case. But I’m very interested in understanding more. Thanks for sharing