|
|
|
|
|
by llbbdd
15 days ago
|
|
Right, but it does gate the actual installation behind a secondary approval in a trustworthy prompt that the page author doesn't control. The page author could of course make a dangerous-but-trustworthy-looking app that would pass muster for the user's approval, but at that point it's not any different than social engineering the installation of any regular malware, e.g. convincing a user to download and execute a dangerous binary. |
|