|
|
|
|
|
by Mattasher
13 days ago
|
|
Interesting document. Especially interesting compared to the Bourbaki movement from a century ago, which was much more focused on universality and correctness, and much less focused on process and attribution (in fact, demanded anonymity). |
|
At least for me, in many cases I have achieved a much better understanding of various things after I studied the historical development of the ideas related to them.
Therefore I agree with the point "2." at "Potential Threats". For me a novel mathematical demonstration that is not presented in a way which disentangles its really new elements from the previously known elements, by proper quotation of all relevant older sources, has a value that is many times lower than that of a demonstration with proper attributions.