|
|
|
|
|
by AnimalMuppet
16 days ago
|
|
I think I can square that circle. If job-seekers were using bots to spam their resume to every job opening, whether they fit it or not, if they were creating resumes that didn't actually fit their talents (lying), and if companies were advertising openings that didn't actually exist, then the true job seekers and the true job openings can't find each other in the sea of lies and spam. And, from what I can gather, that has been increasingly true for a decade. I don't know whether AI has made it worse in the last few years. |
|
I think fake job openings, lying on your resume, and applying everywhere have been a thing as long as jobs have. AI may have supercharged this.
But I don't think the structural issue is that companies advertise nonexistent jobs. Even companies I know are hiring (I know because they're paying in-house recruiters) have a tough time filling those roles.
Neither do I think that lying on resumes is cause of the problem. Even if resume spam is a massive problem, you'd expect that adaptations either in applicant behavior or in talent sourcing would emerge that would remedy this.