|
|
|
|
|
|
by dismalaf
8 days ago
|
|
|
Whoops somehow I missed the 63%. Either way, it's still too slow to be considered production ready. Hare is the only real example of a QBE based language but why put up with something that's C-like with manual memory management but slower than a bunch of managed languages? If I'm going to have to write my own allocations and deal with a static language, it needs to be within spitting distance of C. Not slower than Java, Go or Common Lisp. It's a cool hobby project though, can't take that away from them. On a technical basis, 63% of -O2 with the amount of LOC written is impressive. |
|
|