Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gaiagraphia 16 days ago
There's a difference between the internet in the 90s and today, though.

If those of us fortunate enough to have experienced the early-ish days of the internet grew up using 5 platforms, we probably wouldn't be so nostalgic.

Beating back big tech and their grip has to be priority number 1 into reclaiming the intenrnet.

Nobody bats an eyelid at how gambling sites block out kids. We should be pushing for a world where big tech ad platforms have to play by the same rules as them. Create -EV in society, and get severely regged.

The issue is going to be when draconian rules filter down to the smaller independent sites. i.e. iris scan for 4chan, or get a few rubber stamps across gov departments to open a message board, etc.

Responsiblity has to increase with scale. We can't let nation state tier entities run algos on the youth, it's just madness.

The changes are happening, and shouting 'noooooooooooooo' isn't going to help anybody. Let facebook et al burn under regs, fuck em. The battle is in trying to protect and support the independent internet.

1 comments

Correct.

The right framing is govt vs big tech.

If you support the latter over the former you are an idiot.

How about no govt or corpos? Just ask the damn ISP to provide filtered DNS' and just don't give any smarphone to children until they hit 14-15.
>no gov >no corpo (aren't most ISPs corpos?)

I'd like to plot 'quality of government' vs 'quality of ISPs' on the market. Do the most anarachist/libertarian nations have OP tier internet with 0 censorship? Do the usual suspects in the top 10 of every quality of life measure push for censorship at every step?

Wonder what the outliers are.

Think I might like the idea of 'youth' simcards which have to be bought by parents. No censorship by parents, but they can sign away censorship and data limits/DNS blocking for kids? Is it even possible to enforce this is parents don't have similar restrictions?