[semiquaver]

> This post is already getting too long, so I won’t cover all the extra problems besides the big two.

> There’s no estimate of the environmental impact of all the extra processing

The “environmental impact” of this data processing is one of the “big two” problems with the proposal? Maybe this was just a backup filler argument but it is such a silly point that it immediately makes me question the entire article. This is a massive tell that someone is arguing in bad faith.