Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DrScientist 14 days ago
> Furthermore, the access to compute and capital could end up be the defining factor between researchers and research groups.

That's not new - especially in the experimental sciences ( ie perhaps more than maths ) - where the ability to have access to the latest kit is often what determines success - a huge amount of science progress is driven by new experimental technology rather than smart people thinking beautiful thoughts.
1 comments
TrackerFF 14 days ago
Absolutely, but at least in the pure / less applied fields, access to computation hasn't really been that critical. The more towards the pure and theoretical, less so.

But now you have people like Gowers and Tao, pure mathematicians, hyping up what the SOTA models can do - and I figure they both are getting access and tokens us mortals can't afford.

So I guess the question is - will everything be as expensive as applied fields?

link
DrScientist 14 days ago
Hopefully not as expensive as CERN :-)

Though having said that - the ~5 billion for the LHC now seems cheap ( even inflation adjusted ) in the context of Google investing 180 billion in infrastructure just this year!

link