|
|
|
|
|
|
by bitdiffusion
18 days ago
|
|
|
Maybe because the explanation isn't so much an explanation but an admission that core functionality was broken in a minor version release - and therefore almost orthogonal to the use of AI. If there had been no major regressions, do you think anyone would have complained? People are (correctly) not going to be held to some kind of lower standard just because they "used AI" and "were fixing security issues". |
|
|
If there had been the same regressions but no AI, do you think there would be a 300 post issue full of people complaining? People are holding the update to a higher standard just because they used AI.