[saadn92]

I personally don’t enjoy it. I want to read another human’s thoughts even if it’s filled with mistakes, because at least it’s not fake.

[fkdk]

Do you? Even if its a technical blog post and you learn incorrect things from it?

[Morromist]

Person: I prefer food cooked at home, even if the chef isn't a professional.

You: Do you? even if the chef is covered in bleeding pustules and cooking with rotten food?

No? That's clearly not what they were saying.

[JimDabell]

It clearly was what they were saying:

> even if it’s filled with mistakes

[riffraff]

The mistakes in the original comment are (presumably) grammar and syntax not factual errors.

[fkdk]

Could be, i understood it differently

[analog31]

This is an odd paradox that I've thought about: If AI can produce the technical blog post, then can it also just produce the technical knowledge for me on demand when I need it?

[steve1977]

That's can be just as well the case with AI.

[saadn92]

Well, whether it’s a good piece or not is a different story, but I guess for me it makes me think at least time was spent on it, rather than most AI slop I see nowadays, but who knows, I can be wrong.