[ChrisMarshallNY]

> I wouldn't really want to rely on my lawyer to use AI to write code for me.

Yet that is exactly what a lot of C-Suiters (many of whom are lawyers), are doing.

[xiaoyu2006]

Vice versa there is also a lot of irresponsible programmers doing stupid things with ai. Irresponsible people stay irresponsible, AI just make them more productive at being irresponsible.

[consp]

The problem is the low levels have no influence whatsoever. The higher ups force crap down and none ever comes back.

[tiahura]

Corporations are DEMANDING legal ai because it is so much more efficient.

[ChrisMarshallNY]

Lawyers creating legal stuff, via LLMs is OK. Programmers creating software through LLMs is OK.

Mixing them, is, not, in my experience, OK. In the future, I am sure that LLMs will reach the point, where their output will be beyond reproach, but we're not there, yet.

That means that someone that knows the context and content, needs to vet the output, before sending it on.

[bluefirebrand]

> In the future, I am sure that LLMs will reach the point, where their output will be beyond reproach, but we're not there, yet.

I have no doubt that you're right, but will it be because they are close to infallible or because we have let ourselves become lazy and reliant?

My money is on lazy and reliant based on the trends I'm actually seeing