[makeitdouble]

We could do the same exercise in reverse:

Point me at a laptop with a touch and pen support and detachable keyboard, within the 13" range and 260+ppi resolution, that can virtually run modern software and mid-tier games at workable speeds.

That's the bar my personal laptop clears, and no mac does. Should I be claiming that it has unbeatable hardware ?

PS: We've been in this for a very long time. Even during the PowerPC days, it was a meme to take a mac, adjust for exactly the same hardware specs and tout that the mac was unbeatable for the price. Thing is, having different hardware specs and tradeoffs is exactly the point of the PC market. I still feel great for the people that exactly fit the "one size fits all" offering, but getting a machine that perfectly fits one's needs is extremely valuable IMHO.

[pdimitar]

Sure but that's only a theoretical, as in, a non-existing argument. You don't get to tell me what I want in a laptop; I already stated it and stand by it.

"Unbeatable" comes from "satisfies all my hardware requirements". If you want to be difficult and try to grill me to append "...according to what I deem an important criteria" at the end of each sentence then that's a separate conversation, and one I'll refuse to have.

[makeitdouble]

"the Neo is competitive for basic office and media stuff" can be a better way to put it. I'd say the Surface Pro is a more competent but pricier jack of all trade.

There's so many ways to express the same points with not much more words. Especially when the article is about a machine that is a completely different league from the Neo.

[pdimitar]

> "the Neo is competitive for basic office and media stuff" can be a better way to put it.

Agreed in general, though in my case it would be something like this:

"The Neo is a great thin client through which you can hop around your entire infrastructure and work remotely in it, through the Neo."

Because that is my use-case for it. Travel but not having to work on a machine with 8GB RAM.