|
|
|
|
|
by mindslight
60 days ago
|
|
It sounds like you're trying to shoehorn surveillance telemetry into the model of imaginary property, and then assert we will have a just outcome by construction? But imaginary property has never had this outcome, rather it always benefits larger vectoralists/investors, while perhaps throwing individual creatives a bone. In fact I don't see how what you're describing differs from what we have right now - in every clickwrap "terms and conditions" there is a bit about how you're giving the company a license. This attractor is so strong that in order to buck it, the EU had to come up with a new definition of consent when it created the GDPR, lest it be nullified by the same contractual shenanigans. And I don't know how it would even be possible to adjust that to allow for "consensual licenses" that would do anything but drop right back to 0. |
|