Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by golem14 9 days ago
Maybe I’m getting senile, but the article lacks even the tiniest amount of detail and contains no link to the implementation. I found also nothing on the intarweb about it, other than this article and a few clones of it. I wonder if this is real at all. It’s an IEEE article, so it should be. But I find this lack of detail very depressing.
2 comments

Original article author here: There's isn't anything on the wider web about this project because it is a bespoke creation for IEEE Spectrum's Hands On column! If you're not familiar with the column, it's always written at a pretty high level. That said, I will be putting all the code up on a public repo, once I get a chance (hopefully very soon!) to verify a cold install on a fresh machine does work.
Thanks! To be clear, it’s totally fine to write articles like this, obviously. I just felt that some who goes above and beyond on such an esoteric subject would be vibrating with energy to share as many details with likeminded enthusiasts:)

If I had more time, I’d like to play with this (and trying to recreate an old style stand alone tnc for packet radio) :)

I'm normally pretty good about writing close to length, but the first draft of this 950-word article was over 2,000 words long. :) I only get three pages per issue though, so even though sometimes it's painful deciding what lore to leave out, it has to be done :)
This is just me, but I would have written the 2000 word article, and made it it a md file on github as future home of the code you're going to drop. Then link it from the 950 word IEEE article. Then you'd already have a crystallization point for future work.
Thanks, I thought I was going crazy but yeah, I feel the same way. There are soooo many links in the article, and they're almost entirely irrelevant. It feels like browsing the web with adware installed on your computer in the early 2000s