|
|
|
|
|
by bjoli
22 days ago
|
|
I hard disagree. Previously I could use what I knew about Linux commands to read logs and administer the systemm. Systemctl knowledge does not generalize. I have done scheme all my life, which is why I prefer shepherd. Not only is it in a syntax that i can use elsewhere, I get completion in Emacs. |
|
Systemctl is OK, but I really do not like that respect of the utilities.