[shevy-java]

Normally I'd go - more fines against Meta are great. So, no problem with that.

But ...

This whole "hate speech" is nothing but censorship. I understand that these greedy US giant corporations ruin a lot and abuse the heck out of everyone, but the EU is also incredibly incompetent here. What the heck is even "hate" speech? We are forbidden from criticism? The USA has the freedom of speech amendment. What's the EU solution here - arbitrary censorship? I totally disagree with that notion, and whether it is Meta or anyone else, this is a principle question. The EU should use all that money to invest into more important things than this fakeroy "hate" speech.

[riffraff]

hate speech in the EU is "incitement to violence or hatred based on race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin"[0].

You should be able to see criticism is fine, while calling people "stupid monkeys" is not.

But this isn't even about the EU's definition: Facebook & co have their own definition of hate speech, and they are not holding it up.

[0] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/ju...

[lovich]

The literal forum we are communicating on will ban you for hate speech. I’ve been banned on multiple social media cites for quoting the current president because he has full free speech and we do not.

Pretending that hate speech isn’t a known term is being actively ignorant even though there can be real arguments about where the line is drawn.

[JohnMakin]

If you think calling black footballers monkeys isn't hate speech, there is no explaining anything to you about this topic.

Meanwhile if you're even slightly dickish to one of these people you will get immediately warned or shadowbanned. Meanwhile the post, get notified 9 months later that they reviewed it and found it doesn't violate their terms of service.