[matheusmoreira]

> pangram gives this a 100% score, on account of the em-dashes.

By that logic, at least one of my articles is 100% AI generated.

> And just like that, lone has a conservative garbage collector. Until next time. Soon I'll write about—

[em-bee]

well, that's kind of my implied criticism. which is why i checked what would happen if i removed all the em-dashes. it's not that much better. but i think the number of em-dashes also matters. check your article with and without em-dashes, see what difference it makes.

[nateb2022]

Imo the article is completely copy/pasted from Claude. The figures, which couldn't be copy/pasted verbatim, were screenshotted/pasted.

Quoting from the article.

> The Town of Atherton's lawsuit against Caltrain electrification is the clearest case study we have of how a tiny, wealthy minority can hijack a regional public project — and stick everyone else with the bill.

The unnecessary emdash-for-effect is a huge LLM-ism. No human I know uses such a device in writing.

> Here is the short version. In 2012, Caltrain budgeted its electrification project — the backbone of the Peninsula's transit future and a prerequisite for high-speed rail to ever reach San Francisco — at roughly $1.5 billion. By 2017 that number had ballooned to $1.9 billion. In between, the Town of Atherton sued.

"Here's the short version" along with the bolding of the numbers tells us something about the "author's" prompt. He prompted it for a short version, and told it to include those two numbers.

I challenge any commenter to name one time they began a paragraph with the meager "Here's the short version."

> One veto point, closed.

Why is the comma even there? Classic LLM melodrama.