Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tpm 11 days ago
or they are not to blame because they accepted the possibility of a regression when fixing 6 CVEs
1 comments

Or they are to blame because fixing 1000 CVE's doesn't magically absolve one of responsibility for regression bugs, even if one "accepts" them as a psychological salve.
If you are entitled enough then they are to blame they didn't fix everything at once, but in that case you really should be paying for their product and support. Otherwise fixing security issues has high enough priority to accept there might be downstream bugs that will be fixed in due course.