[latexr]

> If the code is good, bug free, and easily understood

The whole point here is that it wasn’t. That’s the whole reason the submission exists, that allegedly bugs were introduced where it was previously working.

> I can only conclude that this is some kind of misplaced frustration due to job protection and feelings of insecurity that makes people this polarized and religious.

Be careful with assumptions. You are basically expressing that the people you disagree with have petty negative reasons to think how they do. That’s not empathetic and it’s colossally misinformed. I recommend you attempt a good faith search of the myriad reasons people may be against LLMs. Here’s a good faith question on HN to start:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172574

[newtonsmethod]

Can you tell me any of the bugs? All claims I have seen so far of people being affected by bugs seem deeply implausible.

The current ones I see are: * Can't build on Linux < 5.6. But people aren't complaining strongly about this, since it requires a build from source / isn't a result of an update from a distribution (and people can wait for updates / implement them themselves). * An issue hit with chroot false + daemon. People running this in an automated manner (as some claims suggest) are already using it in a way fairly likely to be insecure, chroot false is strongly discouraged here, and the whole point of these commits was that they fixed CVEs impacting precisely these people.