Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Arodex 14 days ago
>Their use accounts for a significant fraction of the 1.1m-1.4m Russian soldiers whom The Economist estimates to have been killed or wounded in the war: one in 25 of the country’s men under 50. Ukraine’s losses are lower, in part because it is costlier to attack than to defend, in part because Ukraine has gone further in substituting robots for humans. Ukraine’s losses equate to one in 16 of its pre-war 18- to 49-year-olds.

... Isn't 1 out of 16 higher than 1 out of 25? (May be still lower in absolute numbers due to the population size difference, but the original text is unclear)

2 comments

The loss rate is higher but the losses are lower, because Ukraine has about 1/4 of the people Russia has.
They have ~1/5th the population of Russia. They shouldn’t use per capita in this context it’s a bit confusing.